This week, Attorney General Eric Holder said it was legal for President Obama to kill Americans with unmanned drones. Yesterday and into last night, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) launched one of those now-rare epic filibusters, actually going all the way to 1 in the morning in a stand against unwarranted assassinations against Americans by their own government. Senator Paul then had to go pee.
Before Senator Paul had to go pee, however, he actually stayed on topic. Senator Paul is being lauded on both sides of the aisle for what actually seems to have been not a political stand for crap, but a principled stand for an ideal against using said drones.
Attorney General Holder listened to his impassioned plea for thirteen (!) hours, and was able to divine one question from it. His answer?
The full text of his delightfully contrasting letter follows:
In case the letter doesn’t show up, it reads:
Dear Senator Paul:
It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: “Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?” The answer to that question is no.
Politicians are remarkably creative when they want to say “f!#K you.”